Claudia Jordan Claims She Rejected Kanye West Out Of Girl Code To Kim Kardashian (Updated)

Updated: Apr 24

UPDATED: 4/24 at 8:31 AM PST


MISPLACED ANGER

Claudi Jordan posted messages about "FAKE NEWS" and doing interviews with "unknowns trying to make a name for themselves" on her Instagram stories. This is all because she decided to bring up an old encounter with Kanye West and then throw Kim Kardashian's name in it during an interview with The Domenick Nati Show. Now, I don't know if she got a phone from Kris or what, but she needs to mad her herself.


Domenick jokingly asked if she would be interested in Kanye. Like I said when I originally posted on this story, she could have just said "No." She chose to speak on Kanye with those raised eyebrows. She strategically decided to say she did not get with Kanye because of Kim Kardashian and "girl code." Why would "girl code" even be an issue if Kim was not with Kanye????


She did not clear up those things but instead decided to make mischievous faces at the camera. She knew what she was doing, and it backfired. Now, she is mad at the interviewer...HOW SWAY?


I think she added that "girl code" shit because she was just accused of helping Gary Owens cheat on his wife and thought it would make a great headline...and it did.






GIRL CODE


Former RHOA star and current Fox Soul host, Claudia Jordan did an interview with The Domenick Nati Show and decided to make some headlines. Domenick asked Claudia if she would be interested in Kanye West. She could have kept it at a simple "No," but chose to spill some wine, tea, Kombucha, whatever you prefer.


Claudia exposed that Kanye tried to get with her, allegedly while he was married to Kim Kardashian. She said, "He tried years ago. Me and Nikki Chu were in the club. They shut the door... I told you that whole story," while sitting next to her boyfriend. She revealed that the hook-up did not happen out of "girl code" to Kim.

Was Claudia trying to make the headlines, being honest, or both?

Say Sumthin, Like, Share...Thanks!

19 views0 comments